The Anti-Corruption Report

The definitive source of actionable intelligence covering anti-corruption laws around the globe

Articles By Topic

By Topic: Insurance

  • From Vol. 6 No.12 (Jun. 21, 2017)

    Five Questions to Ask to Maximize D&O Insurance Coverage of FCPA Claims

    Directors and officers (D&O) insurance policies can help companies manage their anti-corruption risk when conducting business abroad. But to maximize the value of such policies, companies must make sure they are drafted carefully to meet their specific risk profiles. In a guest article, Lowenstein Sandler partner Andrew M. Reidy, along with counsel Joseph M. Saka and associate Ario Fazli, suggest five questions a company should ask to ensure that it is getting the most out of its D&O coverage. See “When and How Can Insurance Policies Offset the Costs of FCPA Investigations?” (Jun. 20, 2012).

    Read Full Article …
  • From Vol. 2 No.5 (Mar. 6, 2013)

    How to Defend Individuals Against FCPA Charges (Part One of Two)

    Government officials repeatedly have stated that FCPA charges against individuals will become more frequent.  Accordingly, defending against such charges is expected to become a more common practice among FCPA lawyers.  But defending individuals against FCPA charges is different in important ways from defending corporations; and the issues faced by corporations whose people are charged are notably different from the issues faced by corporations which themselves are charged.  A panel of experts at the New York City Bar recently shared their insights on salient concerns related to representing individuals facing FCPA charges.  The FCPA Report is synthesizing their advice in a two-part article series.  This article, the first in the series, discusses the primary differences between representing individuals and corporations; the key points to remember when negotiating payment of an individual’s attorney fees; when to enter into and how to draft Joint Defense Agreements; and how to gather information from company counsel.  The second article in this series will address advising individual FCPA defendants on whether to participate in a company interview; when and how to cooperate with counsel for other individuals; and tips for cooperating with the government.

    Read Full Article …
  • From Vol. 1 No.5 (Aug. 8, 2012)

    FCPA Investigation Protection: D&O Insurance and Beyond

    Few subjects receive as much attention in legal, compliance and accounting circles these days as the FCPA, the United Kingdom Bribery Act and other foreign and international anti-corruption laws.  However, while legal issues, compliance questions and legislative initiatives are the subject of constant scrutiny from companies, legal counsel, blogs, commentators and lobbyists, one potential means of ameliorating FCPA risk receives relatively little consideration: insurance.  So, what can a company do in the insurance context to protect itself against the costs of an FCPA investigation and/or proceeding?  In a guest article, M. Machua Millett, a Senior Vice President at international insurance brokerage firm Marsh USA, Inc., addresses this important question.

    Read Full Article …
  • From Vol. 1 No.2 (Jun. 20, 2012)

    When and How Can Insurance Policies Offset the Costs of FCPA Investigations?

    Recently announced probes into the foreign business practices of several major U.S. corporations highlight that we are in an era of heightened FCPA enforcement.  The SEC and the DOJ together conducted more than 250 FCPA-related investigations in the past two years, and a significant jump in enforcement actions is expected in 2012.  Renewed vigilance has brought with it increased consequences.  The government levied penalties totaling more than $1.2 billion from 2002 through 2008, and it has become more aggressive in recent years.  In 2010, for example, U.S. companies paid out a record of nearly $1.8 billion in fines and disgorgement.  Beyond the monetary liabilities associated with FCPA violations, the ancillary costs of investigating and defending such claims can be quite significant.  Depending upon the complexity of the allegations and the size of the company facing them, these costs can accumulate for years and grow to truly staggering proportions.  In light of the heightened FCPA enforcement environment and the potentially significant costs of investigating, defending and settling claims, companies need to understand how insurance policies and principles interact with the FCPA.  In a guest article, John A. Gibbons, a partner and deputy leader of Dickstein Shapiro LLP’s insurance coverage practice, along with Andrew N. Bourne and Jonathan Ari Zakheim, both associates in Dickstein Shapiro’s insurance coverage practice, provide the analysis on which such an understanding can be built.  The article starts with a brief background of the FCPA, then discusses four of the chief insurance issues implicated by the FCPA, namely: FCPA investigations as a “claim” under typical directors and officers insurance policies; reliance by insurance companies on policy exclusions; coverage for restitution and disgorgement; and FCPA-specific insurance products.  In the course of their analysis, the authors offer a comprehensive discussion of the relevant case law.

    Read Full Article …